• 検索結果がありません。

アニュアルレポート・DATA BOOK | サッポロホールディングス

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "アニュアルレポート・DATA BOOK | サッポロホールディングス"

Copied!
52
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

SAPPORO HOLDINGS LIMITED

Annual Report 2009

The Worldwide Name in Quality

(2)

*All figures in this annual report are rounded to the nearest applicable unit. Page

For Sapporo Group Management Plan 2010–2011

Sapporo Group Management Plan 2010–2011 At a Glance

2

Profile

120th Anniversary of YEBISU BEER

3

Financial Highlights

4

Interview With the President

12

Review of Operations 12 Alcoholic Beverages (Japan) 14 Alcoholic Beverages (International) 15 Soft Drinks

16 Restaurants 17 Real Estate

18

Corporate Governance

20

Management

21

Five-Year Summary

22

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

26

Consolidated Balance Sheets

28

Consolidated Statements of Income

29

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

30

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

31

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

47

Corporate Data

(3)

Shift into a growth trajectory by initiating growth strategies and strengthening existing businesses

We will use the plan’s two-year term to transition from a phase of earnings-base strengthening that prioritized structural reform to a growth phase aimed at real- izing our medium-term growth scenarios.

Initiating Growth Strategies

In order to further ensure that we increase our value in the medium- to long-term, we will take steps based on the medium- term growth scenarios and strategic chal- lenges for each of our businesses.

Strengthening Existing Businesses In each business we will build competi- tive advantages by concentrating our management resources on our strong brands and enhancing our ability to adapt to environmental changes.

¥406

billion

¥17

billion

¥6

billion

6.0

%

5.0

%

1.7

Performance Results and Targets Basic Policies

2009 Results 2011 Targets

Sapporo Group Management Plan 2010–2011

Road Map

Sapporo Group’s New Management Framework

Growth Scenario

฀ ฀

strengths, and reinforcement of

Boosted production system at Canada-based

SLEEMAN BREWERIES LTD.

Began full-scale development of beer business in Vietnam through alliance with Vinataba Established a joint

venture in Vietnam

140th Anniversary Year

Sales Target:

¥600

billion

Acquired Canada-based SLEEMAN BREWERIES LTD.

Announced New Management Framework

Formed business alliance with Marudai Food Co., Ltd.

Formed capital and business alliance with Pokka Corporation

Business expansion in North America

Business expansion in Asia

Establish pre-eminence in expanded areas

2006–2009 Management Plan 2010–2011 2012–2016

NET SALES (Incl. alcohol taxes)

¥387.5

billion

OPERATING INCOME

¥12.9

billion

NET INCOME

¥4.5

billion

OPERATING MARGIN (Excl. alcohol taxes)

4.9

%

ROE

3.9

%

D/E RATIO

1.7

At a Glance

(4)

฀ ฀

(Japan)

฀ ฀

(International)

Soft Drinks

Restaurants

Real Estate

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

market by building a distinctive presence

฀฀

of resources

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

market by increasing investment in brands and areas of strength

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

developing Asian market.

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

perspective and develop economically robust restaurant formats and operational structure

฀฀ ฀ ฀

given the harsh market outlook

฀฀ ฀ ฀

any declines

฀฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

power, and shift into a growth trajectory

฀฀

reforms by utilizing group synergies and strate- gic alliances

Products and Services

฀฀Beer ฀ Happo-shu (low-malt beer)

New product genres ฀฀Wine and spirits Shochu (Japanese distilled spirits)

Products and Services Beer

Products and Services Soft drinks Mineral water products

Products and Services

Ginza Lion and other general restaurant chains

Products and Services Yebisu Garden Place Sapporo Factory STRATA GINZA

฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

products

฀฀

฀฀

Cost structure reforms

See P. 12

฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀

฀฀

Growth measures

฀฀

฀฀

See P. 17

Bolster marketing

฀฀

฀฀

Accomplish cost structure reforms

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀

฀฀

See P. 15

Business restructuring

฀฀

Growth measures

฀฀ ฀ ฀

See P. 16

Business growth in North America

฀฀ ฀ ฀

in marketing for strong premium brands

฀฀

฀ ฀

ethnic Asian market

฀฀

฀฀

Expansion into the Asian Market

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

See P. 14

(5)

299,699 282,914 285,000 290,000

08 09 10 11

(Forecast) 0

100,000 200,000 300,000

7,709 7,483 7,500 8,500

08 09 10 11

(Forecast) 0

3,000 6,000 9,000

4.5% 4.7% 4.6% 5.1%

0 2 4 6

08 09 10 11

(Forecast)

Net Sales (Incl. alcohol taxes)

Operating Income (Loss)

Operating Margin

(Excl. alcohol taxes)

Strengths

SLEEMAN BREWERIES LTD.

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀Unibroue ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

Sapporo U.S.A., Inc.

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀Yebisu฀

฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ Grande Polaire฀

25,021 22,582 26,000 27,500

08 09 10 11

0 10,000 20,000 30,000

(Forecast)

901 693 1,000 1,500

08 09 10 11

0 500 1,000 1,500

(Forecast)

3.6% 3.1%

3.8% 5.5%

08 09 10 11

(Forecast) 0

2 4 6

36,849 30,746 32,000 34,000

08 09 10 11

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000

(Forecast)

221 301 700 1,500

08 09 10 11

0 500 1,000 1,500

(Forecast)

0.6% 1.0% 2.2%

4.4%

08 09 10 11

(Forecast) 0

1 2 3 4 5

29,538 28,026 27,000 28,000

08 09 10 11

0 10,000 20,000 30,000

(Forecast)

551 –172 200 500

08 09 10 11

(Forecast) –200

0 200 400 600

1.9%

–0.6% 0.7%

1.8%

–1 0 1 2 3

08 09 10 11

(Forecast)

23,452 23,267 24,500 26,500

08 09 10 11

0 10,000 20,000 30,000

(Forecast)

7,612 7,524 8,000 10,000

08 09 10 11

0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000

(Forecast)

32.5% 32.3% 32.7% 37.7%

0 10 20 30 40

08 09 10 11

(Forecast)

(6)

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

1890

Yebisu Beer is launched 1901

The Yebisu freight station was built for handling Yebisu Beer

1928

Yebisu becomes the name for a district of Tokyo (Ebisu)

1971

Yebisu Beer is revived as a premium brand after a 28 year hiatus.

Present

฀ ฀ ฀

(7)

453,671 435,090 449,011 414,558 387,534

05 06 07 08 09

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000

฀ ฀

฀ ฀฀

2009 2009

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ¥387,534 $4,209,127

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 12,896 140,067

฀ ฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 4,535 49,260

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ¥11.57 $0.13

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 11.05 0.12

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 7.00 0.08

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ¥118,591 $1,288,048

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 506,875 5,505,319

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 23,485 255,075

฀ ฀ ฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 22,547 244,889

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ 196,794 2,137,443

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

Operating Income

Net Income

Financial Liabilities and Capital Expenditures

Net Sales

10,300 8,613 12,363 14,685 12,896

05 06 07 08 09

0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000

3,630 2,338 5,509 7,640 4,535

05 06 07 08 09

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

16,218 30,790 19,548 29,378 23,485

05 06 07 08 09

220,723 236,033

212,464 189,252

196,794

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000

(8)

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

How did the Sapporo Group perform in

2009, and what is your evaluation of its

performance?

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

Growth Scenarios

฀ ฀

10,300 8,613 12,363 14,685 12,896

05 06 07 08 09

0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000

Operating Income

(9)

What is your policy on shareholder

returns in this period?

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Building on our Competitive Strength and

Strengthening our Earnings Base

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Around two years have passed since

you announced the New Management

Framework. How is it progressing?

Cash Dividends per Share

5 5 5 7 7

05 06 07 08 09

0 2 4 6 8

(10)

฀Mugi to Hop฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀shochu฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

Measures to Ensure Sustainable Growth

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

SLEEMAN BREWERIES’ Sales

Y-o-Y sales volume 2009

SLEEMAN brands 110%

Overall Canadian demand

(Sapporo Holdings estimate) 98%

09 08 07 06* 05

–1,000 –500 0 500 1,000

Liquor, and Japanese Liquor (Shochu) Business

฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀shochu฀

(11)

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

What are the goals of the new manage-

ment plan that you have announced?

Could you please clarify the relation-

ship of the new plan to the New

Management Framework?

Beer Production Volume in Vietnam

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

78 146 165 185 680

00 05 06 07 25

0 50 100 150 200 700

∼∼

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

(12)

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Please tell us about the numerical

targets and the strategy of the

Management Plan 2010–2011.

One of the key strategies in the

Management Plan 2010–2011 is to take

action based on medium-term growth

scenarios for each business. What kind

of scenarios are these?

Management Targets

(13)

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀shochu฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

(14)

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀Mugi to Hop ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀Sapporo Potekaru฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

We should consider the strategies in

the Management Plan 2010–2011 as the

first steps towards achieving the

growth scenarios for each business.

Could you then explain the two key

strategies of launching growth strate-

gies and strengthening existing busi-

ness in more detail?

(15)

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀Yebisu Bar฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀Yebisu Bar฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

(16)

3,798 6,189 7,709 7,483

06 07 08 09

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

321,128 315,893 299,699 282,914

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000

06 07 08 09

฀ ฀

Beer Business

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Yebisu Beer฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀Yebisu Silk฀ ฀Kohaku Yebisu ฀

Yebisu฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀Mugi to Hop฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀Off no Zeitaku ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀happo-shu฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

Net Sales

฀Mugi to Hop ฀Yebisu ฀

Operating Income

฀Yebisu Silk ฀Yebisu฀ the Black ฀Yebisu฀ the Hop ฀

฀Yebisu Stout Creamy Top

(17)

The Japanese Beer Industry and Sapporo Beer

Demand Trends

In 2009, Japan’s beer market—made up of beer, happo-shu and new prod- uct genres—saw demand for new product genres increase by a sharp 21% year on year, reflecting unseasonable summer weather and intensifying deflationary forces due to the protracted economic downturn. With consum- ers increasingly tightening their belts, demand for beer and happo-shu fell 7% and 16% year on year, respectively. Consequently, total demand in Japan’s beer market decreased just over 2% year on year.

Sapporo’s Basic Approach

In 2010, total demand in Japan’s beer market should continue to contract based on concerns over the deepening recession and the possible onset of a deflationary spiral. Accordingly, total demand in Japan’s beer market in 2010 is projected to decrease by nearly 2% from 2009.

Amid such a market environment, we aim to boost earnings by offering uniquely Sapporo value propositions. Toward this end, our first priority is to conduct marketing that induces consumers to experience our beer products’ refreshing taste, using a communication message of Bringing more cheer to your “Cheers!” (translated from the Japanese).

More specifically, we will primarily focus on further increasing the market presence of three brands in particular: our long-standing Yebisu Beer and Sapporo Draft Beer Black Label brands, and Mugi to Hop, a new product genre brand with favorable prospects for continued sales growth in 2010.

We also aim to win more fans for Sapporo products—by targeting acquisition of new growth brands, and actively proposing new taste sensa- tions again.

Wine Business

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀Mythique฀

Beringer฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

Shochu Business

Shochu฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀Waramugi ฀Karariimo ฀

฀ ฀ ฀shochu ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀La Cuvée Mythique ฀Waramugi

(18)

385 1,665 901 693 0

600 1,200 1,800

06 07 08 09

5,292 27,777 25,021 22,582

0 10,000 20,000 30,000

06 07 08 09

฀ ฀

SLEEMAN BREWERIES LTD.

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Sapporo U.S.A., Inc.

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀

Net Sales

Operating Income

(19)

–426 –839 221 301

06 07 08 09

–1,000 –500 0 500

58,731 52,239 36,849 30,746

06 07 08 09

0 20,000 40,000 60,000

฀ ฀

Soft Drinks

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀Ribbon Citron ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀Gabunomi ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀One

Piece.฀ ฀Gerolsteiner฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Foods Business

฀Sapporo Potekaru฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Net Sales

Operating Income (Loss)

฀Ribbon Citron ฀Gerolsteiner ฀ Gabunomi Milk Coffee

(20)

457 656 551 –172 –200

0 200 400 600 800

06 07 08 09

26,995 28,954 29,538 28,026

0 10,000 20,000 30,000

06 07 08 09

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀Sapporo Lion Beer Hall

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀Kakoiya฀ ฀Tomoru฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀Yebisu

Bar ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀izakaya฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Net Sales

Operating Income (Loss)

฀ ฀

฀Tomoru฀ ฀

(21)

6,414 7,073 7,612 7,524

06 07 08 09

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000

22,828 24,148 23,452 23,267

0 10,000 20,000 30,000

06 07 08 09

฀ ฀

Existing Properties

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀

Real Estate Development

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

New Income-Generating

Property Acquisitions

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Net Sales

Operating Income

฀Renga-kan

(22)

Corporate Governance Framework

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Corporate Functions and Internal Control Relationships

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Accounting Auditor (Independent

Auditor)

Appointment/Dismissal Appointment/Dismissal

Audit

Board of Directors Directors Outside Directors

Supervision

Board of Corporate Auditors Corporate Auditors

Outside Auditors

Report Election/ Supervision President and Representative

Director, Group CEO

Nominating Committee Compensation Committee

Advice

Monitoring

Management Council Group Management Council

Group Risk Management Committee

Group Environment Protection Committee

Group CSR Promotion Committee

Group Personal Information Protection Committee

Legal Advisor (Law Firm)

Group Companies

Group Audit Department Internal

Control/Risk Management

(23)

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Upgrading the Internal Control System

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Internal Audits and Corporate Audits

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀

Risk Management

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

Compliance

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀ ฀

(24)

Management฀

Board of Corporate Auditors

Kenichi฀Shishido

Isao฀Takehara**฀ Norio฀Henmi** Keizo฀Ae

Board of Directors

A฀scene฀from฀the฀Museum฀of฀Yebisu฀Beer,฀which฀opened฀on฀February฀25,฀2010฀to฀commemorate฀120฀years฀of฀Yebisu฀Beer

1฀ Takao฀Murakami

President฀and฀Representative฀฀

Director,฀Group฀Ceo

2฀ Yoshiyuki฀Mochida฀

Managing฀Director

3฀ Tsutomu฀Kamijo

Managing฀Director

4฀ Fumiaki฀Terasaka

Managing฀Director

5฀ Hiroaki฀eto

Director*

6฀ Hiroshi฀Tanaka

Director*

7฀ Nobuo฀Katsumata

Director*

8฀ Kazuo฀ushio

Director

9฀ Hidenori฀Tanaka

Director

10฀Yoichi฀Kato

Director

*฀฀ outside฀Director

**฀outside฀Auditor

1

2 4 3

5 6

7

8

9 10

(25)

Five-Year Summary

(Years ended December 31)

Millions of yen

2009 2008 2007 2006 2005

Net sales . . . ¥387,534 ¥414,558 ¥449,011 ¥435,090 ¥453,671 Alcoholic Beverages . . . 305,496 324,720 343,670 326,420 341,077 Soft Drinks . . . 30,746 36,849 52,239 58,731 63,897 Restaurants . . . 28,026 29,538 28,954 26,995 26,331 Real Estate . . . 23,267 23,452 24,148 22,828 21,696 Other . . . – – – 116 670

Operating cost and expenses . . . 374,638 399,873 436,649 426,477 443,371 Operating income . . . 12,896 14,685 12,363 8,613 10,300

Income before income taxes and minority interests . . . 8,874 17,970 221 3,978 6,573

Net income . . . 4,535 7,640 5,509 2,338 3,630

Yen Per share:

Net income:

Primary . . . ¥ 11.57 ¥ 19.49 ¥ 14.10 ¥ 6.38 ¥ 10.20 Diluted . . . 11.05 18.89 13.76 5.88 9.18 Net assets . . . 302.16 297.60 319.07 300.13 305.00 Cash dividends . . . 7.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

Millions of yen Year-end data:

Net assets . . . ¥118,591 ¥116,862 ¥125,189 ¥113,496 ¥111,411 Total assets . . . 506,875 527,287 561,859 589,597 563,845 Financial liabilities . . . 196,794 189,252 212,464 236,033 220,723 ROE (%) . . . 3.9 6.3 4.6 2.1 3.6 Capital expenditures . . . 23,485 29,378 19,548 30,790 16,218 Depreciation and amortization . . . 22,547 21,605 24,527 21,930 22,075

(26)

Sapporo Holdings Limited and the Sapporo Group

The Sapporo Group endeavored to strengthen its earnings base and expand operations that capitalize on its strengths in pursuit of sus- tained growth in accordance with the key priorities of its rolling two- year Management Plan based on the Sapporo Group’s New Management Framework unveiled in 2007.

To realize sustained growth into the future, the Group laid the groundwork for attaining the Management Plan’s targets through such means as deciding to expand the beer business into Vietnam, forming a capital and operational alliance with Pokka Corporation, and initiating a joint venture with the Marudai Food Group in the yoghurt, dessert, and chilled beverage markets. In terms of strength- ening its earnings base, the Group made progress toward achieving the Management Plan’s earnings targets by continuously tightening cost controls and reforming its cost structure with the aim of achiev- ing earnings stability amid a changing economic environment.

In terms of the scope of consolidation, the Company had 35 consolidated subsidiaries and 7 equity-method affiliates in the year ended December 31, 2009.

Operational Overview

In 2009, the perennially export-dependent Japanese economy was hard hit by a major contraction in global demand amid a synchronous global recession ensuing from the financial crisis that began the previ- ous autumn.

Against such a backdrop, the Japanese economy was beset by deepening deflation as companies were forced to downsize their workforces and curtail investment, resulting in large declines in domestic consumer spending and capital investment.

In the alcoholic beverage, soft drink, and restaurant industries in which the Group operates, weak consumer spending and unseason- able summer weather weighed heavily on corporate earnings.

In the real estate industry, Tokyo-area office building rents and vacancy rates continued to worsen from January. Although the deteriora- tion trend has gradually slowed since mid-2009, it has yet to reverse.

Consolidated Operating Results

Net Sales

Net sales decreased ¥27,024 million, or 6.5%, year on year to ¥387,534 million.

By business segment, Alcoholic Beverages saw a 5.9% year-on- year decline in net sales to ¥305,496 million. This decrease partly reflected lower sales volume and a higher share of low-priced new product genres in total sales in the Alcoholic Beverages (Japan) busi- ness, as well as the impact of a stronger yen on the Alcoholic Beverages (International) business.

The Soft Drinks segment recorded a 16.6% year-on-year drop in net sales to ¥30,746 million, partly due to the discontinuation of unprofitable sales and changes in accounting standards.

The Restaurants segment recorded a 5.1% year-on-year decrease in net sales to ¥28,026 million, largely due to weak consumer spending.

The Real Estate segment recorded a 0.8% year-on-year decrease in net sales to ¥23,267 million, partly the result of the sale of a 15% co-ownership stake in Yebisu Garden Place.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales decreased ¥20,456 million, or 7.1%, year on year to

¥267,690 million in line with the lower net sales. The cost of sales ratio decreased 0.4 percentage points to 69.1%.

This decrease mainly reflected overall cost reductions and a better product mix, despite factors pushing up the cost of sales, including the application of the “Accounting Standard for Measurement of Inventories” and a change in the useful lives for depreciation of machinery assets.

132.2 126.4 131.6 111.7 106.9

05 06 07 08 09

29.1 29.0 29.3 27.0 27.6

0 10 20 30 40

0 40 80 120 160

10.3 8.6 12.4 14.7 12.9

05 06 07 08 09

0 3 6 9 12 15

3.6 2.3 5.5 7.6 4.5

05 06 07 08 09

10.2

6.4 14.1

19.5

11.6

0 5 10 15 20

0 3 6 9 12

SG&A Expenses and Percentage of Net Sales

(¥ Billion, %)

Net Sales and Cost of Sales Ratio

(¥ Billion, %)

Net Sales Cost of Sales Ratio

SG&A Expenses Percentage of Net Sales

Net Income and Net Income per Share (Primary)

(¥ Billion, ¥)

Operating Income

(¥ Billion)

Net Income

Net Income per Share (Primary)

453.7 435.1 449.0 414.6 387.5

05 06 07 08 09

68.6 69.0 67.9 69.5 69.1

0 20 40 60 80

0 150 300 450 600

(27)

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses decreased

¥4,779 million, or 4.3%, year on year to ¥106,948 million.

The main reasons were a decrease in sales incentives and com- missions due to reduced unprofitable sales in the Soft Drinks busi- ness, and a decrease in sales promotion and advertising expenses in the Alcoholic Beverages business, as the Company used sales promo- tion and advertising spending more efficiently by focusing spending on core brands.

Operating Income

Operating income decreased ¥1,789 million, or 12.2%, year on year to

¥12,896 million, partly due to accounting standard and tax code changes. The impact from accounting standard and tax code changes mainly consisted of higher operating expenses, specifically an ¥829 million yen increase due to the application of the “Accounting Standard for the Measurement of Inventories” and a ¥1,569 million increase due to a change in the useful lives for depreciation of machinery assets.

Other Income (Expenses)

Other expenses were ¥4,022 million, compared with other income of

¥3,285 million in the previous year.

With regard to net financial income (expenses), calculated as the sum of interest and dividend income minus interest expense, the Company recorded expenses of ¥2,688 million in fiscal 2009, a slight improvement on the previous year, despite increased finan- cial liabilities. This mainly reflected reduced interest expenses at foreign subsidiaries.

The Company recorded equity in income of affiliates of ¥276 million compared with equity in loss of affiliates of ¥1 million in the previous year. This change partly reflected the addition of two affili- ates accounted for by the equity-method: Pokka Corporation and Azumino Food Co., Ltd.

The Company also recorded a ¥948 million gain on sales of property, plant and equipment, mainly due to the sale of part of the former Osaka plant site.

There was a large improvement in other expenses due to the transfer of the loss on disposal of inventories to cost of sales in line with a change in accounting standards. Previously, the loss on dis- posal of inventories was recorded under other expenses.

The Company recorded a loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment of ¥1,524 million, mainly due to upgrading beer- production facilities and other assets.

The Company booked a loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment of ¥926 million on properties for which investment recovery is expected to be difficult due to declining profitability.

Income Before Income Taxes and Minority Interests

As a result of the above and other factors, income before income taxes and minority interests decreased ¥9,096 million to ¥8,874 million.

Income Taxes and Net Income

Income taxes applicable to the Company, calculated as the sum of corporation, inhabitants’ and enterprise taxes, were ¥4,350 million. Income taxes accounted for 49.0% of income before income taxes and minority interests. The difference between this percentage and the statutory effective tax rate of 40.7% mainly reflected the recording of a valuation allowance.

As a result, net income was ¥4,535 million, down 40.6% year on year.

Segment Information

Millions of yen

Net Sales

Operating Income/ Loss

Depreciation and

Amortization ExpendituresCapital

Alcoholic Beverages 305,496 8,176 15,220 10,054

(Japan) 282,914 7,483 – –

(International) 22,582 693 – –

Soft Drinks 30,746 301 385 1,466

Restaurants 28,026 (172) 776 875

Real Estate 23,267 7,524 6,161 11,073

Assets, Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

The Sapporo Group has a cash management system (CMS), which enables Sapporo Holdings to centrally manage fund allocation within the Group in Japan.

The concentration at the Company of cash flows generated by individual Group companies helps preserve fund liquidity, while flexible and efficient fund allocation within the Group serves to mini- mize financial liabilities.

The Company strives to secure fund procurement channels and liquidity to make certain that ample funds are on hand to cover pres- ent and future operating activities, as well as the repayment of debts and other funding needs. Necessary funds are procured mainly from cash flows from operating activities, loans primarily from financial institutions, and the issuance of corporate bonds.

Assets

Total assets at December 31, 2009 stood at ¥506,875 million, down

¥20,412 million, or 3.9%, from a year ago.

This was mainly the result of a decrease in current assets due to lower cash and cash equivalents. However, this decrease was partly offset by an increase in investment securities due to the acquisition of Pokka Corporation shares, and new property.

Liabilities

Financial liabilities increased ¥7,542 million to ¥196,794 million. Total liabilities decreased ¥22,140 million, or 5.4%, from a year earlier to ¥388,284 million. This mainly reflected decreases in corpo- rate bonds and short-term bank loans as well as lower deposits accompanying the termination of gift voucher certificates. However, these decreases were partly offset by increased long-term loans.

参照

関連したドキュメント

We present sufficient conditions for the existence of solutions to Neu- mann and periodic boundary-value problems for some class of quasilinear ordinary differential equations.. We

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

[Mag3] , Painlev´ e-type differential equations for the recurrence coefficients of semi- classical orthogonal polynomials, J. Zaslavsky , Asymptotic expansions of ratios of

[r]

(6) As explained in Note 34 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, as announced in the New Comprehensive Special Business Plan approved by the Government of Japan

For the year ended March 31, 2013, TEPCO recorded an operating loss due mainly to the decrease in the volume of nuclear power generation and increased fuel expenses resulting

On the other hand, the Company submitted an application to the Fund to change the amount of financial support based on the Clause 43, Article 1 of the Fund Act due to the

In order to provide for compensation payments for nuclear damages concerning the accident of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power station damaged by the Tohoku-Chihou-Taiheiyou-Oki